Health Inspection Information

The inspection history for the business you selected is displayed below. Each inspection may have zero or more violations. A health inspection report is a "snapshot" of the day and time of the inspection. On any given day, an establishment could have more or fewer violations than noted here. Inspections are based on regulations to eliminate risk factors for illness or injury. Every violation is coded indicating the degree of risk in causing an illness or injury.

  • Critical, Major, or Foodborne Illness Risk Factor Violations: These violations are more likely than other violations to contribute to illness or injury. Inspectors work with operators to make sure that these violations are corrected whenever feasible before they leave the establishment. A re-inspection may be scheduled to verify compliance.
  • Non-Critical, Minor or Good Retail Practice Violations: These violations are not directly related to the cause of illness or injury, but if uncorrected, could negatively affect the operation of the facility, such as maintenance and cleanliness.

Please Note: Tri-County converted to a new database in July 2013. Any inspections listed prior to July 2013 only display the date and type of inspection, but not the inspector comments because of the database conversion. For inspection reports prior to July 2013 please submit a written request to EHInspections@tchd.org.


Facility Details
Program Food
Facility Name Bistro King
Business Name Bistro King
Address 3542 S Fox St
Englewood, CO 80110-3416
Phone 303-781-9898

Inspection Details
10/25/2022 Inspection, Routine
01 - Foodborne Illness Risk Factors
Person in charge present, demonstrates knowledge, and performs duties
Inspector Comments: The person in charge did not explain the correct procedure for cleaning and sanitizing utensils and dishware. Corrective action: The inspector explained the procedure to be wash, rinse, sanitize, and air dry, provided an English sticker as a resource, and provided a Chinese handout.
02 - Foodborne Illness Risk Factors
Certified Food Protection Manager
Inspector Comments: The restaurant did not have a certified food protection manager.
03 - Foodborne Illness Risk Factors
Management, food employee and conditional employee; knowledge, responsibilities and reporting
Inspector Comments: The person in charge did not know the symptoms of foodborne illness. The restaurant did not have a verifiable, e.g. written, policy telling employees what to do if they have foodborne illness symptoms. Corrective action: The inspector educated the person in charge on this and provided a written Chinese policy.
05 - Foodborne Illness Risk Factors
Procedures for responding to vomiting and diarrheal events
Inspector Comments: The restaurant did not have procedures for cleaning up after vomit/diarrhea events. Corrective action: The inspector provided a written procedure in Chinese.
08 - Foodborne Illness Risk Factors
Hands clean & properly washed
Inspector Comments: An employee at the grill line cleaned his hands with a common towel. An employee at the grill line rinsed his hands off in the wok faucet water and dried them with a common towel. Corrective action: The inspector educated the person in charge on monitoring employee hand washing.
09 - Foodborne Illness Risk Factors
No bare hand contact with RTE food or a pre-approved alternative procedure properly allowed
Inspector Comments: An employee at the sushi bar handled ready-to-eat lettuce with his bare hand. Corrective action: The inspector educated the person in charge on this, and the employee soon put on gloves.
15 - Foodborne Illness Risk Factors
Food separated and protected
Inspector Comments: An employee at the sushi bar used the same glove to handle raw salmon, then ready-to-eat sushi rice. An employee at the sushi bar cleaned his gloves with a damp towel. Raw chicken in the walk-in refrigerator was stored above raw fish and raw beef. Raw shell eggs and raw pooled eggs in the cold-top refrigerator were stored above ready-to-eat broth, ready-to-eat scallops, and cooked noodles. Raw chicken in the wait-station refrigerator was stored above ready-to-eat sauces. Raw salmon in the sushi bar area refrigerator was stored on top of packaged, cooked fish cake. Corrective action: The inspector educated the person in charge on proper glove use and proper raw food stacking. The raw foods were moved to appropriate locations.
16 - Foodborne Illness Risk Factors
Food contact surfaces; cleaned & sanitized
Inspector Comments: An employee at the sushi bar did not sanitize the cutting board in between using it for raw salmon and then vegetables. The same tongs in the cold-top refrigerator were used for raw chicken, raw shrimp, and raw beef and were not cleaned and sanitized in between different animal species. Corrective action: The inspector educated the person in charge on cleaning and sanitizing procedures. The person in charge provided separate scoops for each raw meat.
22 - Foodborne Illness Risk Factors
Proper cold holding temperatures
Inspector Comments: Cut lettuce and bean sprouts (45-46°F) in the cold-top refrigerator were greater than 41°F. Corrective action: The inspector discussed measures to keep these foods cold, including keeping a lid on the foods.
23 - Foodborne Illness Risk Factors
Proper date marking and disposition
Inspector Comments: The following foods were not marked with a date once prepared/thawed to be used within 7 days: (in the walk-in refrigerator) barbecue pork, (in the cold-top refrigerator) cooked scallops, and (in the sushi bar refrigerator) cooked eel. Corrective action: The inspector educated the person in charge on date marking.
25 - Foodborne Illness Risk Factors
Consumer advisory provided for raw/undercooked food
Inspector Comments: The paper sushi menu did not asterisk * the fish items that are served raw, and the consumer advisory footnote did not include an asterisk *. The sushi specials menu did not include a consumer advisory. Corrective action: The inspector provided a Chinese handout on this.
28 - Foodborne Illness Risk Factors
Toxic substances properly identified, stored & used
Inspector Comments: A chemical spray bottle of degreaser under the food preparation sink and a blue chemical spray bottle under the cash register were not labeled as to their contents. Corrective action: The person in charge agreed to label all chemicals.
39 - Good Retail Practices
Contamination prevented during food preparation, storage & display
Inspector Comments: A stained towel across from the dish machine was touching sushi rice. Several food containers in the walk-in refrigerator were stored on the floor.
41 - Good Retail Practices
Wiping Cloths; properly used & stored
Inspector Comments: Several wet wiping cloths throughout the kitchen and sushi bar were not stored in sanitizer between uses.
43 - Good Retail Practices
In-use utensils: properly stored
Inspector Comments: A knife at the cold-top refrigerator was stored in the crevice between equipment. The wait station area rice scoop was stored in ice water.
44 - Good Retail Practices
Utensils, equipment & linens: properly stored, dried, & handled
Inspector Comments: Several bowls and food containers at the dish washing area were not air dried before stacking.
48 - Good Retail Practices
Warewashing facilities: installed, maintained, & used; test strips
Inspector Comments: An employee at the grill line cleaned a wok scoop with a stained towel.

Please Note: Tri-County converted to a new database in July 2013. Any inspections listed prior to July 2013 only display the date and type of inspection, but not the inspector comments because of the database conversion. For inspection reports prior to July 2013 please submit a written request to EHInspections@tchd.org.


Search Again